Which bias is this?


Which bias is this? A daily quiz on the cognitive biases that quietly shape your decisions: read a real-world scenario, name the bias behind it, and learn why your mind does it. A new scenario waits every day.

Which bias is this?

Choosing news sources that echo your existing politics and dismissing the rest as biased.

Pick the bias behind the scenario. A new one waits each day — come back to keep your streak.

Spot the bias — every scenario


60 everyday scenarios and the cognitive bias behind each — read the full explanation on any bias page.

  • Choosing news sources that echo your existing politics and dismissing the rest as biased.

    Confirmation bias
  • Sitting through a bad film to the end because you paid for the ticket.

    Sunk-cost fallacy
  • Feeling “basically an expert” after a single tutorial or one popular-science book.

    Dunning–Kruger effect
  • A high “original price” making a sale price feel like a bargain.

    Anchoring bias
  • Studying only successful founders for “the habits of success,” ignoring identical habits in those who failed.

    Survivorship bias
  • Fearing plane crashes more than car crashes, though driving is far deadlier per mile.

    Availability heuristic
  • “The market crash was obviously coming” — said only after it happened.

    Hindsight bias
  • Assuming attractive people are also kinder, smarter, or more competent.

    Halo effect
  • Holding a losing investment to avoid “realizing” the loss.

    Loss aversion
  • “90% fat-free” outselling the identical “10% fat”.

    Framing effect
  • One harsh comment outweighing ten compliments.

    Negativity bias
  • Expecting a rising market to keep rising because it rose lately.

    Recency bias
  • Assuming a driver who cut you off is rude, not rushing to an emergency.

    Fundamental attribution error
  • “I aced it” after a pass, but “the test was unfair” after a fail.

    Self-serving bias
  • A stock or trend surging simply because more people are piling in.

    Bandwagon effect
  • Assuming your project will finish on time though most similar ones overran — the planning fallacy.

    Optimism bias
  • Home renovations and software projects routinely running double their estimate.

    The planning fallacy
  • Betting on black after five reds on roulette — the odds are still about 50/50.

    The gambler’s fallacy
  • Staying on a worse phone, insurance, or energy plan because switching is effort.

    Status-quo bias
  • Patients following an obviously wrong instruction because "the doctor said so."

    Authority bias
  • Fearing a rare-disease diagnosis from a positive test, ignoring that the disease’s rarity makes most positives false.

    Base-rate neglect
  • The jam study: a 24-flavour display drew more browsers but about ten times fewer buyers than a 6-flavour one.

    Choice overload
  • A painful medical procedure remembered as less bad when its final moments were milder — even if it lasted longer overall.

    The peak-end rule
  • The "tappers and listeners" study: tappers of a tune were sure listeners would recognise it about half the time; the real rate was ~2.5%.

    The curse of knowledge
  • Being sure everyone noticed the stain on your shirt or your one clumsy comment in a meeting.

    The spotlight effect
  • The Economist’s pricing: a print-only option priced the same as print+web made print+web the "obvious" deal.

    The decoy effect
  • A song you disliked growing on you after repeated play.

    The mere-exposure effect
  • Valuing self-built furniture, gardens, or code above objectively better alternatives.

    The IKEA effect
  • Judging the same action as fine from your side and outrageous from the other.

    In-group bias
  • Most drivers rating themselves safer than average.

    Illusory superiority
  • Not checking your investment account when markets fall.

    The ostrich effect
  • A cliffhanger keeping a show on your mind until the next episode.

    The Zeigarnik effect
  • In the classic mug experiment, people given a mug demanded roughly twice the price to sell it that others would pay to buy the same mug.

    Endowment effect
  • A smoker who knows smoking is harmful decides "the research is overblown" rather than quit.

    Cognitive dissonance
  • Throwing dice harder for high numbers and softer for low ones, as if force affects the roll.

    Illusion of control
  • Choosing $50 now over $100 in a year, but $100 in six years over $50 in five — the same gap, opposite choice.

    Hyperbolic discounting
  • Showing someone facts that debunk a political myth they believe, after which they cling to it harder.

    Backfire effect
  • Assuming a robbery or assault victim "should have known better" or was somehow asking for it.

    Just-world hypothesis
  • Confidently identifying confirmation bias in someone you disagree with, certain you have none yourself.

    Bias blind spot
  • Learning a new word, then "suddenly" seeing it in three articles that week.

    Frequency illusion
  • Told someone is quiet and loves books, guessing "librarian" over "salesperson" — though salespeople vastly outnumber librarians.

    Representativeness heuristic
  • Studies where people’s "90% confidence intervals" contain the true answer only about half the time.

    Overconfidence effect
  • Assuming "most people" vote the way you do because everyone in your circle does.

    False-consensus effect
  • Betting more on a gambler or basketball player who is "hot" after several wins or makes.

    Hot-hand fallacy
  • A horoscope saying "you have a great need for others to like you, yet tend to be self-critical" feeling spot-on.

    Barnum effect
  • You were late because of traffic; your colleague was late because they’re disorganised.

    Actor–observer bias
  • Judging a technology you like (or a brand you love) as both more beneficial and less risky than the evidence shows.

    Affect heuristic
  • Believing it always rains right after you wash the car, recalling the hits and forgetting the dry days.

    Illusory correlation
  • Remembering the first few items on a long grocery list and forgetting the middle.

    Primacy effect
  • Seeing "hot spots" on a map of random events and inferring a cause.

    Clustering illusion
  • Assuming a presentation will go badly despite a strong track record.

    Pessimism bias
  • Wanting a banned book or film far more precisely because it was banned.

    Reactance
  • Refusing a vaccine with a tiny risk while accepting a larger risk from the disease, because action feels riskier.

    Omission bias
  • A goalkeeper diving left or right on a penalty, though staying centred saves more — because diving "looks" like trying.

    Action bias
  • A $1,000 watch seeming cheap after you were shown a $10,000 one first.

    Contrast effect
  • Feeling sure everyone can tell you’re anxious during a speech, when the audience notices little.

    Illusion of transparency
  • A minor risk becoming a public panic as media coverage feeds on itself.

    Availability cascade
  • Students whose teachers were told (at random) they were "high potential" improving more over the year.

    Pygmalion effect
  • Grocery shopping hungry and buying far more than you’ll want to eat.

    Projection bias
  • Confidently planning to resist temptation when full, then caving when hungry or tired.

    Empathy gap

All 60+ cognitive biases →·Reading rooms